The Trump administration on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to pause a ruling by a federal judge in Washington, D.C., that ...

Updated on March 9 at 5:14 p.m. The Supreme Court added just one case – a technical dispute over the interaction between two ...

Critics and supporters of President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship often focus on the order’s barring of automatic citizenship to children born to individuals unlawfully ...

Free speech on university campuses is a perennially hot topic, perhaps most recently reflected in protests about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at places like Ball State University, Harvard, and ...

Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean for the law, for lawyers and lower courts, and for people’s lives. […] ...

You’ve likely heard of AI bots being used improperly by lawyers, but what about lawsuits over AI bots practicing law without a license? Reuters reported on one such case last […] ...

Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. United States ’s bar against a servicemember’s ability to bring tort claims “incident to service” is only triggered when the injury was directly caused by the ...

A Second Opinion is a recurring series by Haley Proctor on the Second Amendment and constitutional litigation. Last Monday, the Supreme Court heard argument in United States v. Hemani. In […] ...

SCOTUSblog is excited to announce the addition of podcasts Amarica’s Constitution and Divided Argument to its podcast lineup, joining Advisory Opinions. While both podcasts will maintain their ...

Brothers in Law is a recurring series by brothers Akhil and Vikram Amar, with special emphasis on measuring what the Supreme Court says against what the Constitution itself says. For more content from ...

SCOTUSblog is excited to announce the addition of podcasts Amarica’s Constitution and Divided Argument to its podcast lineup, joining Advisory Opinions. In a new, jam-packed episode, the hosts of all ...

Issue: (1) Whether courts must reverse for Griffin v. California error without examining a prosecutor’s comment in context ...