Jaggo Vs. Union of India & Ors. Anita & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.

3. Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the State of Tamil Nadu. 4. As noted above, the appellant is charge sheeted only under Section 27 ...

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition filed by the petitioner, vide impugned judgment dated 08.07.2022, holding that the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by ...

12. As for the matter with regard to grant of anticipatory bail to the respondents-accused, the law has been enunciated by this Court in Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi)2, wherein it was held ...

During the course of investigation, it was found that the said Anil Kumar Sethi entered in service as Stipendiary Engineer in the year 1993 in Orissa State Housing Board Corporation and worked there ...

i. Respondent shall be allowed to visit the minor daughter every Sunday between 10:00 AM and 02:00 PM. ii. Such visits shall take place in Madurai, in a public park or a temple premises, and in the ...

2. Vide The Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 in the State of Uttar Pradesh the land over and above a certain limit was to be declared surplus and was then to vest with ...

4. We have heard Shri S. Nagamuthu, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Shri N.R. Elango, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the State of Tamil Nadu.

1. Delay in filing as well as in refiling stands condoned. 2. Leave granted. 3. In the present case, on the past few dates, the appellant has taken this Court to the long history of the case. The ...

2. This present petition is arising out of order dated 29.03.2023 passed by National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, "the National Commission") in Revision Petition No. 2808 of 2018 ...

2. The Union of India is in appeal against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Patna1 allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent challenging the order of the ...