News
Nokia signed on to continue its long-standing team up with Intel, tapping its Xeon 6 line, specifically the Xeon 6780E, to provide energy-efficient capacity to power its NFVI v5.0 and Core Networks ...
14d
XDA Developers on MSNDespite its terrible power efficiency, I refuse to part with my dual-CPU serverI wrote an article about my reasons for choosing modern hardware instead of old server parts going forward. In fact, I’ve already started using my repertoire of SBCs, mini-PCs, and even NAS units as ...
Intel's best processors might pull a lot of power, but they're also super powerful. Here are the best Intel CPUs to buy in 2025.
Again, Epyc bests the Broadwell Xeon E5 server on cores, and on memory as well; however, this could very well change when Intel comes out with Skylake servers sometime in 2017.
Then AMD introduced the Opteron Dual Core processor in early 2005, with a 2x performance advantage per socket over Intel’s contemporary Xeon processors for about the same price and power ...
Last month, Intel's new naming scheme for its Xeon processors leaked. Instead of E3, E5, and E7 branding, the chips would be given metallic names, from Bronze at the bottom-end through Silver and ...
In the mid-2000s, Intel broke the server processor line into three chunks, with the Xeon 3000 series being aimed at single socket machines, the Xeon 5000s being aimed at machines with two sockets, and ...
Naples is a two-socket server chip aimed squarely at Intel's Broadwell-EP-based Xeon E5 V4 range, and the overall theme of AMD's chip is "have more of everything." ...
Yep, it's a gargantula. While Intel already has 22-core processors in its Xeon line-up, you may add to that 24, 28 and 32 core Xeon processors. Photos appeared online on taobao.com showcasing a ...
The previous-gen Xeon E5-2699 V4 processor had 22 physical CPU cores, and 44 threads. We should expect the Skylake-EP processors to launch at around Computex 2017 (late May, early June next year).
Nearly across the board, the Intel Core i7 6950X was the top performer, with the only exception being "ProRes 4K > H.264 1080p" where the dual Xeon E5-2643 V3 was about 7% faster.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results